The PACT project aims to provide the necessary elements for rapidly introducing
policy to combat climate change - giving parliamentarians, civil servants, and
advocates around the world access to the legal and technical expertise needed to
envisage, to argue for and to enact laws and policies that effectively protect
the climate. Find out more...
Combining FITs with other support mechanisms is possible, so long as the interactions are considered when designing the FIT.
In general, combinations of the FIT law with the following widespread support instruments can be considered:
Tax incentives include, besides others, exemptions or reductions from income tax, customs duties and sales tax. Provisions for tax incentives are sometimes included in different legal provisions and not in the FIT law itself. Investment incentives help to cover the total costs of a renewable electricity project. The positive effect of tax and investment incentives on the total project cost should be considered when setting the tariff (or price). As this can be a difficult task, it might be more appropriate to separate remuneration under the FIT from (certain) tax and investment incentives.
Even though we consider FIT laws to be the most effective and efficient support mechanism a combination with RPS is both possible and feasible. If your country already has a RPS scheme established, the combination of RPS and FIT is promising in the case of medium- to long-term technologies, i.e. those technologies that today are still rather expensive in comparison to conventional energy sources (i.e. PV). RPS schemes are designed in a way that only the most cost-efficient technologies are supported. Consequently, RPS have little incentive effects on the photovoltaic industry without additional support. A FIT law just for PV can be introduced, as in the case of Italy. In this case, PV power plants are exempt from the RPS scheme. Another possibility is to include mid- or long-term technologies, such as PV, in both support mechanisms. Under those conditions, the feed-in tariff for these technologies has to be reduced by the (expected) additional revenue incomes from the RPS scheme. Notwithstanding the above, we generally recommend introducing a FIT law for all technologies, rather than combining RPS and FIT.
Tender schemes might serve as an additional support scheme. When the FIT is linked to a target and it becomes obvious that the target will not be reached, one way to respond is to call for tenders to generate additional capacity, as the French example shows. The legislator should consider, however, whether the adoption of FIT tariffs (or prices) would not be a more appropriate step to trigger investments. This way, the complexity of the support mechanism can be minimised.
In developing countries, an increasing number of renewable electricity projects seek financing under the so-called Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) set up by the Kyoto Protocol. CDM projects must meet, for example, the "additionality" criterion under the Kyoto Protocol.
If CDM support is granted, the FIT law would need to ensure that double-funding is not provided. In addition, there should be transparent legal frameworks in both the developed and developing countries involved in renewable energy CDM projects.
For example, the FIT policies of Pakistan and of Sri Lanka encourage CDM use.
Policy for Development of Renewable Energy for Power Generation 2006, section 8.2.1 & 8.3.3 provide that:
National Energy Policies and Strategies of Sri Lanka 2006, section 3.4 and 3.10 provide that:
As a general rule, renewable electricity projects that receive or have received payments from other support programmes are usually excluded from the payment of tariffs under the FIT law (see how this time restriction affects plant eligibility).
Learn more about these support mechanisms
Learn more about the advantages of FITs in comparison to these support mechanisms.