The PACT project aims to provide the necessary elements for rapidly introducing
policy to combat climate change - giving parliamentarians, civil servants, and
advocates around the world access to the legal and technical expertise needed to
envisage, to argue for and to enact laws and policies that effectively protect
the climate. Find out more...
Setting technology-specific tariffs (or prices) helps:
For each technology, legislators need to consider a verifiable and transparent calculation methodology, as well as setting tariffs (or prices) differently depending on location and size.
See an overview of tariffs (or prices) applying in EU countries in 2006.
Tariffs (or prices) tend to be based usually on average generation costs or on avoided external costs.
Experience suggests that setting tariffs on the basis of average generation costs supports a quick take-off in renewable electricity. By contrast, the "avoided cost" approach only coincidentally leads to an optimal tariff (or price). We therefore recommend the average generation costs method.
Different renewable energy technologies have different costs. The main factors affecting the average generation cost of a particular technology include:
Comparing the average generation costs with the expected amount of generated electricity and the estimated lifetime of a typical, standard plant, the remuneration can be fixed on a per kWh basis.
To determine the average generation costs it is recommended to calculate typical, standard applications of the different technologies used for electricity generation from renewable energy sources under the typical conditions of your region or country. In many regions or countries, some research and development has been carried out that might help in this case. At the same time, it is useful to compare the results with other countries or regions with similar geographic and economic conditions.
External costs arise:
EU Commission (2003): External Costs
For setting tariffs (or prices), external costs related to climate change, health and building damage from air pollution, agricultural yield loss, and energy supply security should be considered. In addition, the avoided market costs can be taken into account. This includes the costs that would be involved in generating the electricity from non-renewable sources and the avoided grid losses.
Read a 2006 study (in German) comparing the external costs of electricity produced from renewable energy and fossil sources and concluding that the support given to renewables costs less than the avoided external costs.
FIT laws commonly set location-specific tariffs (or prices), depending on the availability of a particular source, especially wind, in a given locality. This involves, for example, setting a higher tariff (or price) in less windy places. These do tend, though, to increase complexity, and so you might not consider them appropriate until your country or region has gained some experience with a FIT law.
For example: wind tariffs are determined by location in France.
In France, the tariff/price for onshore wind is fixed at 8,2 €cents/kWh for all plants for the first 10 years. For the following five years, the tariff/price depends on the full load hours (which were evaluated in the first 10 years). At very good wind spots with more than 3,600 full-load hours, a tariff of only 2.8 €cents/kWh is paid. At locations with bad wind condition (2,400 full-load hours or less) the tariff remains at 8,2 €cents/kWh. The tariff for location with average wind conditions varies depending on the full-load hours.
Arrêté of 10th July 2006, Annex, section 3 provides that:
Annual duration of reference | T for the 10 first years | T for the 5 following years |
2400 hours and less | 8.2 | 8.2 |
Between 2400 and 2800 hours | 8.2 | Linear interpolation |
2800 hours | 8.2 | 6.8 |
Between 2800 and 3600 hours | 8.2 | Linear interpolation |
3600 hours | 8.2 | 2.8 |
Arrêté du 10 juillet 2006, Annexe, section 3 dispose que:
DURÉE ANNUELLE | T POUR LES 10 | T POUR LES 5 |
2400 heures et moins | 8.2 | 8.2 |
Entre 2400 et 2800 heures | 8.2 | Interpolation linéaire |
2800 heures | 8.2 | 6.8 |
Entre 2800 et 3600 heures | 8.2 | Interpolation linéaire |
3600 heures | 8.2 | 2.8 |
Generally, economies of scale mean that larger production plants will produce electricity at lower cost. This could lead to windfall profits for the owners of large plants. Therefore, almost all existing FIT laws set specific tariffs for a particular technology in relation to plant size.
The most straightforward way to do this is to group plants into size categories by capacity bandwidth, and to set the tariff (or price) at different, decreasing levels from the smaller to the larger plants. For example, different tariffs for biomass plants could be:
For example:
Different tariff (or price) groups have been enacted in Spain for hydro power plants, with one group including "hydroelectric power plants whose installed capacity is no more than 10 MW", and another group including "hydroelectric power plants whose installed capacity is more than 10 MW but no greater than 50 MW." [RD 661/2007, § 2]
The Austrian FIT law establishes four size related categories for biomass (for the different "fuel types" three additional categories are set up). Group 1: all plants up to 2 MW capacity. Group 2: all plants with more than 2 and up to 5 MW capacity. Group 3: all plants with more than 5 and up to 10 MW capacity. Group 4: all plants with more that 10 MW capacity. More information
Text setting technology-specific tariffs (or prices) will appear automatically in your proposed law document, once you have made your choices for eligible technologies and plants.
If you have already made these choices, take a look at the text and Table in section 8(1) and (2) to see how they look. You can insert the tariff (or price) in the Table offline.